Spencer Heath's
Series
Spencer Heath Archive
Items 43 and 43a
April 1961?
Original contains more material, mostly columns, than what is in this document, but I don’t find an original numbered 43a.
The principle of discontinuity, once accepted, compels the conclusion that there are in nature fundamental least units. For without this there could be no rational distinction of one quantity from another, no numbers (of units) to represent quantities and thereby no ratios in which numbers can be compared and no understandable rational order in the world. We may deny the fact of discontinuity but to do so we must give up the idea of integers and numbers as intrinsic in the environment whence our own rationality must of necessity be derived. Physical scientists, in their quest for understanding of their objective world, have made most advance in their examinations first of simple phenomena or events. Discovering the rationale of few and relatively simple occurrences they have extrapolated into the more intricate and complex and found there the same basic unity of method and process, mode and procedure, operating through widely divergent and superficially dissimilar forms. For examples: The mechanical equivalence of heat, the photosynthetic process as carried on in an endless variety of vegetative structures and forms, and the processes of mitosis and metabolism in the reproduction and the maintenance of all living structures and forms.
Human feelings, emotions, whether positive or negative, are not susceptible of any rational analysis, for there are no discrete units into which they may be numerically resolved and hence no numerical magnitudes in which they can be quantified and compared and their rationale disclosed. They do not yield to any numerical analyses and can therefore be only intuitively and not rationally felt, known or conceived. They are direct and immediate responses to any objective situation, giving rise to action, wise or unwise, without benefit of analysis or rational contemplation.
The events which constitute all objective phenomena, however, do exhibit quantitative procedures, processes, rhythms and uniform repetitions that, taken in units, can be measured in numbers and thereby rationally understood. For this purpose physical science employs uniform conventional units such as the gram, the centimeter and the second in numerical combinations of which, and thus alone do physical events impinge on and excite the human consciousness through the sensory apparatus in which it is physically housed. These three units represent the three elements or aspects of or in which physical events are organized or composed and in which they in three-fold combination and ratio separately impinge upon the human sensorium and are thus consciously perceived.
These three units, or whatever they represent, may be variously defined, but, taken objectively and operationally, the gram may be taken to represent whatever can be measured in terms of the gram, such as mass, weight, force, inertia etc.; whatever can be measured in centimeters, such as motion, distance or nearness, “space” etc; and whatever can be measured in seconds, such as periods or intervals of time, rhythms, cycles, repetitions, frequencies etc. And the event, phenomena or succession of events in which these three elements or aspects are in various proportions numerically composed may be objectively defined as work, action, energy etc., care being taken always to distinguish between a rate or proportion of work, action or energy — the quantity related to a single unit of time — and the particular whole quantity which is being measured, conceived or ascertained.
The “quantum of action” is defined as that fixed quantity of work, energy or action — any happening or event whose magnitude or over-all dimension is the same as one gram of mass having one centimeter of motion with one dyne of force (or inertia).
Force or inertia is that property of mass in virtue of which it can both impart and/or undergo change of motion.
Motion is an ever-present variable property of mass
Considering the three measurable aspects or elements of any work, action or event — namely, mass, motion and time —
Force and its converse, inertia, are those properties of mass whereby motion is imparted or conserved
Action and reaction are equal and opposite
All action is inter-action
The form, proportions and composition of energy or action are variable; its total quantity always both indefinite and unchanged.
Motion is that property of mass whereby force or its converse, inertia, is imparted or conserved.
Motion is always discontinuous. It therefore involves time both as interval or duration and as frequency or times during an interval — these being reciprocal and converse.
Time or frequency is the discontinuous rhythmic and repetitive manner in which work or action, as mass having motion, proceeds.
Given the rate of work, energy or action — that quantity which appertains to a single unit of time — then the number of time units involved determines the quantity of work, energy or action as a whole.
Physical understanding gives mankind the potential of a technical (creative or destructive) dominion over their objective world.
April 22, 1961
From Galileo to Planck it was known that the three elements or aspects of energy or action could be quantified in numerical dimensions based on conventional units, but since no units fundamental in nature were known it was supposed that all the data of experience were divisible without end. In the year 1900, however, came the great discovery of Prof. Max Planck that there is a certain minimum magnitude in less than which, singly or in multiple, energy or action as events either does not occur in nature or, if it does by a logical inference so occur, does not afford any data concerning the objective world. This discovery of a fundamental event refers to its magnitude only. It has no reference to the manner, composition or form in which the constituent elements or aspects of this minimal event are integrated, organized and composed. It can therefore be considered whether or not the Mass aspect, the Motion aspect and the Time also are discrete and discontinuous and thus must be based on some fundamental units each of its own kind in less than which they do not unite to constitute the full-bodied minimum process or event which is the quantum of action of Planck. On this point we must either give up the notion of discontinuity and therewith the possibility of numerical quantities and of any purely rational organization of them, or we must take it that such units do exist. This is further reinforced by the well-known fact that within the organization of the quantum unit with its fixed over-all magnitude there is a top limit to which the velocity element can attain. This known maximum of velocity (velocity of light etc.) makes it necessary that when the velocity element is at its maximum the mass element must be at its single ultimate least unit in terms of grams.
Now, taking a single erg-second as represented, per definition, of a single unit each of mass, motion and time, we have
Mass units per unit of motion
/Continues next page/
Motion units per unit of time
Time units. Duration of wave or event, seconds
Work Energy or action units
1 x 1 x 1 = 1 Erg-second
Motion Motion
————–> /wave — doesn’t
transcribe/
Rectilinear Transverse (or
centimeters per second rotational or
radial)
Both motions coincidental
Both at velocity of light c
Velocity — Number of centimeters per second
Frequency — Number of waves per second
Velocity (c) divided by Frequency = Period of wave,
seconds
Suppose one unitary erg-second — composition 1 x 1 x 1 = 1.
Then V = one centimeter per second. If wave length is one centimeter then f = 1 and energy is one erg per second and one erg per wave.
Now suppose f = 10–10 waves per second l/10 erg per wave
l/10 second per wave–period
One wave per second one erg per second
f = 1 centimeter Length = 1 centimeter
Suppose energy rate—-momentum–one dyne-centimeter-second–same at all frequencies, then,
m v t
1 x 1 x 1 = 1 erg quantity
momentum m v t
energy rate l x l x l
ergs per sec Let t be l/10 second f = 10
Then —
ergs per second x seconds l/10 x 1 x 10 waves per second
Quantity of ergs during Now, let v = c
a period of time — any number Then l/10c x c x 10 = one erg
of seconds.
Suppose frequency multiplies and repeats the energy — transforms the right-line energy into transverse energy. Then energy per second would vary with frequency. High energy, high frequency. Each wave would repeat the whole erg-second.
Then mechanical energy varies with velocity and Radiant energy varies with frequency
Then one dyne-centimeter per second. 2 (dyne)-centimeter per second = 2 ergs per second. But radiant energy cannot change its velocity — so it can increase its rate only by increasing its frequency. And it can’t increase its velocity because it is quantized to the least unit of mass.
(This seems to make sense)
/Editorial note: It is unclear why I did not number these two items independently; it may be that the originals were attached together. The originals can be consulted to see if that was the case. In the schematics above, rectilinear motion was represented by a horizontal arrow, and transverse or rotational or radial motion was represented in the original by an undulating line, something I could not reproduce on the equipment at my disposal. -MacCallum /
Metadata
Title | Subject - 43 - The Principle Of Discontinuity |
Collection Name | Spencer Heath Archive |
Series | Subject |
Box number | 1:1-116 |
Document number | 43 |
Date / Year | 1961-04-01 |
Authors / Creators / Correspondents | |
Description | Original contains more material, mostly columns, than what is in this document, but I don’t find an original numbered 43a. |
Keywords | Psychology Science Rationality Least Units |