Spencer Heath's
Series
Spencer Heath Archive
Item 2356
Letter sent to each of a list of 26 backers of the Freeman magazine, critiquing Glenn Hoover’s article of July 27, 1953, “What Is Left of the Single Tax?” (Heath’s comment: “Nothing is.”), an article supposedly rebutting a Single Tax article in the previous issue but accepting all of its five basic premises. Enclosed with each letter was Heath’s article entitled “How Come that We Finance World Communism?”, containing a critique of each of the premises. His article was not accepted for publication, the matter of the Single Tax supposedly having been covered on both sides and the issue closed. Following the letter reproduced here is the list of backers of the Freeman to whom it was sent on August 28 (list provided by Gertrude E. Vogt at the Freeman, August 24). Following the list are the relevant extracts from those who responded.
Dear Mr. ________ : August 28, 1953
Perhaps it will interest you to see the enclosed Definitive Exposé, in the form of an unanswered letter to the editor, of each one of the five basic premises of the Land Communist argument as they were set out approvingly and unqualifiedly endorsed in the Freeman for July 27, 1953.
Whether or not these basic premises represent the view of the Freeman, they were printed in the Freeman’s columns and have not been specifically answered.
Communism is a real and present menace in our midst. It rests on the false that we allow to masquerade as true. It is not necessary, not even intelligent, to accept its basic premises. To do so is tantamount to swallowing the whole “line.” To be indifferent is to play into their hands.
Do you not think the error of these premises should be publicized?
Sincerely,
/s/ Spencer Heath
SH:sm
ENC.
_____________________________________________
Directors:
Mr. John W. Hill
Hill & Knowlton
Empire State Building
New York, N. Y.
Alex L. Hillman
Hillman Periodicals
535 Fifth Avenue
New York, N. Y.
Mr. W. F. Peter
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RR
Chicago, Illinois
Mr. Henning W. Prentis, Jr.
Armstrong Cork Co.
Lancaster, Penna.
-0O0-
Mr. James Bruce
National Dairy Products Co.
260 Madison Avenue
New York, N. Y.
Mr. Victor Emanuel
Avco Manufacturing Corp.
420 Lexington Avenue New York, NY
Mr. B. E. Hutchinson
Chrysler Corporation
Detroit, Michigan
Mr. Edward P. Hutton
61 Broadway
New York 6, NY
Mr. Sterling Morton
120 So. La Salle Street
Chicago, Illinois
Mr. Edgar H. Queeny
Monsanto Chemical Co.
1700 S. 2nd Street
St. Louis, Missouri
Mr. Benjamin E. Tate
Carew Tower
Cincinnati 2, Ohio
Mr. Pierre F. Goodrich
Electric Building
Indianapolis 4, Indiana
Mr. Eliot Janeway
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY
Mr. William Loeb
Union Leader Corp.
Manchester, New Hampshire
General Henry J. Reilly
Hotel Fourteen
14 East 60th Street
New York, NY
Col. Truman Smith
Greenfield Hill
Fairfield, Connecticut
Mr. Herschel Williams
River House
435 East 52nd Street
New York, NY
Contributors:
Mr. Louis Bromfield
Malabar Farm
Lucas, Ohio
Mr. Lawrence R. Brown
Publicker Industries
1429 Walnut Street
Philadelphia 2, Pa.
Mr. George Creel
Bohemian Club
San Francisco, Calif
Mr. Garet Garrett
Tuckahoe, New Jersey
Mr. Harold Loeb
424 East 57th Street
Mr. Towner Phelan
St. Louis Union Trust Co,
St. Louis, Missouri
New York 22, NY
Mr. Donald R. Richberg
1000 Vermont Avenue
Washington 5, DC
Copies sent August 22, 1953 to the following
persons, backers of freeman magazine:
John Chamberlain
c/o Barron’s Weekly
40 New Street
New York City 4
Wm. Henry Chamberlin
40 New Street
New York 4, NY
Jasper Crane
c/o E. I. Dupont Co.
Wilmington, Del.
John Davenport, Ed.
Barron’s Financial Weekly
40 New Street
New York City 4
Max Eastman
Nantucket, Mass.
Lawrence Fertig
149 Madison Ave.
New York, NY
John T. Flynn
3511 222nd Street
Bayside, Long Island, N.Y.
Mr. Frank C. Hanighen
1855 K Street NW
Washington 6, DC
Dr. Ludwig von Mises
777 West End Ave.
New York, NY
Howard Pew
c/o Sun Oil Co.
Philadelphia, Penna.
Leonard Read
Foundation for Economic Education
Irvington-on-Hudson, New York
Rev. Stewart Robinson
Elizabeth, NJ
Claude Robinson
Public Opinion Institute
Princeton, NJ
Rev. Stewart Robinson
Elizabeth, NJ
Edward A. Rumley
205 E. 42d Street
New York, NY
(Committee for Constitutional Government)
Professor Leo Wolman
Columbia University
995 Park Avenue
Morningside Heights
New York, NY
___________________________________________
Responses:
Lawrence Fertig August 24, 1953
My understanding is the The Freeman editors and directors are definitely against the Single Tax. They published this article and .. an answer to the article by Dr. Frank Knight of the University of Chicago. Thus, they presented both sides of the case.
I, myself, am not happy that the original article in favor of the Land Tax was published since I think it is a bad tax, and anyway, the issue is a dead one.
Jasper E. Crane August 25, 1953
It is curious how many people who are ardently opposed to socialism and in favor of freedom still manage to believe in the single tax.
J. Howard Pew August 25, 1953
I must confess that the whole principle of the Single Tax seemed to me to be so absurd that I never gave it the study that I probably should. What you say rings true, and I was a sympathetic reader.
Leo Wolman August 25, 1953
I think you are right.
John Davenport August 26, 1953
.. I certainly find your arguments both succinct and persuasive.
Garet Garrett September 2, 1953
It is a rule of my life not to get myself involved in a single tax argument. It is like a religion and whether you win or not you are bound to lose.
Towner Phelan September 2, 1953
..I am in agreement with you that the single tax involves the socialization of land and should be opposed by all those who believe in freedom.
Claude Robinson September 2, 1953
I do not feel sufficiently posted on the subject of the single tax to have any worthwhile views.
Sterling Morton September 3, 1953
I believe this matter of a single tax has been argued by wiser men than myself for a great many years — and there is still great divergence of opinion. Under the circumstances, I would be loath indeed to enter into the controversy.
Donald R. Richberg September 7, 1953
I read your letter of August 28, with enclosures, with much interest and considerable sympathy. This I have indicated in a letter I am writing today to Mr. Hazlitt.
William Loeb September 10, 1953
Frankly, I have never considered myself enough of an economist to pass judgment on Henry George’s ideas. …
Suffice to say that I just don’t feel that I have any basis for judging George’s remarks and, therefore, your rebuttal.
I can only say that I am glad to see anyone who is willing to strike at any form of Communism, wherever it raises its head.
H. W. Prentis, Jr. September 11, 1953
You point out clearly the fallacies in that tax theory.
Max Eastman October 19, 1953
This is just a line to thank you for your letter and tell you I read the enclosures with a lot of interest and learned something from them.
_____________________________
Metadata
Title | Correspondence - 2356 |
Collection Name | Spencer Heath Archive |
Series | Correspondence |
Box number | 15:2181-2410 |
Document number | 2356 |
Date / Year | |
Authors / Creators / Correspondents | |
Description | Letter sent to each of a list of 26 backers of the Freeman magazine, critiquing Glenn Hoover’s article of July 27, 1953, “What Is Left of the Single Tax?” (Heath’s comment: “Nothing is.”), an article supposedly rebutting a Single Tax article in the previous issue but accepting all of its five basic premises. Enclosed with each letter was Heath’s article entitled “How Come that We Finance World Communism?”, containing a critique of each of the premises. His article was not accepted for publication, the matter of the Single Tax supposedly having been covered on both sides and the issue closed. Following the letter reproduced here is the list of backers of the Freeman to whom it was sent on August 28 (list provided by Gertrude E. Vogt at the Freeman, August 24). Following the list are the relevant extracts from those who responded. |
Keywords | Single Tax Basic Premises |